Imagine a scenario where you have a judgment indebted person with a non-normal last name. Imagine a scenario where open records show that they appear to possess two houses. Imagine a scenario in which the open records show a similar name as the proprietor of the two houses, anyway the insights regarding them are not actually the equivalent. Imagine a scenario in which their (maybe shortened) dates of birth (DOB) and standardized savings numbers (SSN) are not actually the equivalent; anyway they are exceptionally close, excessively near accept they are truly isolated individuals.
This article is my conclusion, and not lawful counsel. I am a judgment referral master, and am not a legal counselor. On the off chance that you ever need any legitimate exhortation or a technique to utilize, if you don’t mind contact a legal advisor.
Quite possibly this situation is only a fortuitous event, and there are two individuals with a similar first, center, and last names, with astoundingly comparative SSNs and DOBs that live in a similar region. Be that as it may, it is no doubt a similar individual. Some judgment account holders utilize substitute SSNs routinely to endeavor to impede loan bosses.
How might you demonstrate it is a similar individual (or maybe not all that) you can record liens or perhaps take other authorization activities? The issue with open record database search administrations is they are not great. They are extraordinary instruments, anyway they are not the last word.
Open data records are commonly not allowable in court since they incorporate a few layers of gossip, and it is difficult to get an observer to establish the best possible framework for acceptability. Another issue is the grammatical mistakes and blunders that aggregate in broad daylight records. All things considered, open databases can as a rule offer you the response, regardless of whether that answer isn’t allowable in court. One generally excellent marker would be if “both” individuals had a similar location history as well as similar family members.
A credit report may clean things up straight up. On the off chance that the judgment borrower is paying advances on the two properties, that will reveal to you the response without a doubt. In any case, you need passable reason to pull credit reports. You can possibly pull a credit report on somebody in the event that you are an assortment office, a lawyer speaking to a leaser, or own a judgment against an individual through a task of judgment.
Open databases help you figure out where to pull records at the province recorder. What may show the genuine story, is the marks on record for the properties. At the point when the names are the equivalent, and the marks appear to be identical, that implies the individual is most likely the equivalent.
Go to the region recorder, and pull duplicates of the deeds of trust, and whatever else you can discover; so you can get penmanship models on this individual or people. You will need to take a gander at earlier properties possessed, check for archives with marks, perceive how the properties are held by the assessor, and where the duty bills get sent.
You could likewise record the name(s) of the notary(s) before whom the deeds were recognized, at that point serve an open records act demand on the public accountants. Their log books are open records. You needn’t bother with a summon for a public accountant’s log book.
You could likewise check whether “both” individuals experienced a similar home loan organization, maybe with a similar escrow. That would be another insight this isn’t a fortuitous event. Additionally, see who financed their advances. Take a gander at the “GF Number” (certification document #) on the deed. This shows where you should summon the records. The home loan organization will have a document on every exchange, which will incorporate an application for credit with heaps of private money related data. You may likewise need to summon the title organizations since they have a record for every exchange.